Pilladas En La Calle Wendy Gratis

A debate on the future of criticism Architectural





last decade, epoch-making changes have profoundly reshaped the context within which it is conceived and discusses the architecture. The Internet has made it possible for information and free images were available and instantly accessible by anyone anywhere on the globe. The magazines, once the undisputed creator of architectural criticism and design, have been pushed to redefine its raison d'etre and its own economic model in the light of the decrease in readers, blogs have given a potentially unlimited audience to anyone have an Internet connection. In this context, architectural criticism in the traditional sense seems closer to disappear, not only from newspapers but also on the web paper. As written by Peter Kelly, director of Blueprint , in a recent editorial:

"Because the traditional media and the institutions themselves have become less influential, one wonders where architects can help you find a critique intelligent and based their works. "



How will Italian architecture, whose history is inextricably linked to that of his great paper texts, the proliferation of open networks, autonomous and free of debate online about the projects? Architects today try really an "intelligent and well-founded criticism" of their works, or the figure of the architecture critic rather be considered an anachronism?

is needed urgently, as Kelly writes, an on-line approach to more realistic and rigorous architectural criticism? Meeting at

Design Library in Milan will be the second of three debates on the future of architectural criticism, organized by Domus to London, Milan and New York, and will be attended by writers, editors of newspapers, bloggers and industry players theorists.
Participants: